Finding What the Literature Really Says
A search strategy should evolve as you learn how the literature is described, but refinement can quietly change what the search means. Learn how to improve terminology, fields, operators, and database-specific syntax while keeping the underlying research question stable.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
More search terms do not automatically produce a better search. Whether they help or hurt depends largely on what the terms represent and how they are combined.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
A search strategy can contain hundreds of terms and still retrieve the wrong literature. Length reflects complexity, not necessarily quality, so every concept, term, operator, and restriction still needs justification.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
A research question and a database search string serve different purposes. Some concepts that are essential for deciding study eligibility may be poor retrieval concepts and can make the search unnecessarily restrictive.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
A precise search retrieves a relatively high proportion of relevant records, but there is no universal percentage that makes a search precise enough. The appropriate level depends on the purpose of the search, screening burden, and sensitivity you would sacrifice to improve it.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
Sensitivity and precision measure different aspects of search performance, and improving one can sometimes worsen the other. Which deserves greater emphasis depends on what the search is intended to accomplish.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
Irrelevant papers do not necessarily mean your database search is badly designed. Learn how to diagnose where the noise is coming from and improve precision without sacrificing important studies.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
If a paper you know exists does not appear in your database search, treat it as a diagnostic clue. Trace why the search missed it before simply adding more terms.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
A single broad or ambiguous term can overwhelm an otherwise sensible database search. Learn how to measure its contribution and fix the term without weakening the whole strategy.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
When a concept is too broad, adding more search terms may only create a larger and less coherent query. Clarify what the concept means in your study before trying to make the database solve the problem.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
You do not need to repeat the same literature searches every week to stay current. Build a monitoring system using saved searches, database alerts, citation alerts, journal notifications, and a short routine for reviewing what arrives.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
Database alerts rerun a saved search against newly added records and notify you when something matches. The useful ones come from searches precise enough to catch important new research without flooding you with irrelevant results.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
Citation alerts and keyword alerts monitor different signals. Citation alerts follow new work connected to a known paper, while keyword alerts look for new records matching a topic, so the right choice depends on what you want to keep watching.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
Keeping up with a research field does not mean reading every paper it produces. A sustainable system monitors several useful signals, screens new research quickly, and reserves close reading for work that could actually change what you know or do.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
Researchers, journals, and topics provide different routes to new research. Following topics usually gives the broadest coverage, while selected researchers and journals can add useful signals that topic searches may miss.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
Theses, dissertations, reports, and working papers are scattered across repositories, specialist databases, organizational websites, and search engines. Learn where to search and how to find documents that conventional journal databases may miss.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
Preprints can provide timely access to research before journal peer review, particularly in rapidly developing fields. Whether you should include them depends on your review purpose, eligibility criteria, and how carefully you manage their provisional and versioned status.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
Regional databases can be important when your question depends on evidence from a particular country or region. Whether you should search them depends on where relevant research is likely to be published and how well your existing databases cover it.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
A good literature search often retrieves papers you will never need to read in full. Screening helps you identify which records can be excluded quickly and which deserve closer examination.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
Title and abstract screening is not about deciding whether a paper is good or reading it in full. Your task is to identify clearly ineligible records while retaining anything that could reasonably meet your review criteria.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
A misleading title should not decide whether a study is included or excluded. Screen against your eligibility criteria using the abstract and, when necessary, the full text.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
Remembering a paper is less important than being able to recover why it mattered. Leave a compact retrieval trail that records its contribution, relevance to your work, key evidence, limitations, connections, and what you intended to do with it.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
A study may discuss exercise, AI use, stress, treatment, or lived experience while examining something much more specific. Identify exactly what was observed, delivered, or explored.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
Two studies can appear to contradict each other while actually answering different questions. Before calling findings inconsistent, determine whether the studies are sufficiently comparable for their conclusions to conflict at all.
Read Guide →
Finding What the Literature Really Says
Research databases do not contain identical slices of the scholarly literature. When indexing and database coverage are associated with study characteristics or findings, the evidence researchers retrieve can differ from the evidence that actually exists.
Read Guide →
