Top Scientists in Enabling & Strategic Technologies (2026)
Explore scientists classified in Enabling & Strategic Technologies in the 2026 single-year ranking, with global rankings, institutions, countries and historical representation.
Historical Listings
2020–2026 · Both ranking typesDisciplines with Similar Representation
Closest scientist counts listed in 2026 Single-year dataset.
Top 10 Scientists in Enabling & Strategic Technologies
2026 · Single-year| Field position | Worldwide | Scientist | c-score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 |  Wang, Zhong Lin Chinese Academy of Sciences, China | 5.27 |
| 2 | 17 |  Li, Heng Harvard Medical School, United States of America | 4.99 |
| 3 | 25 |  Gogotsi, Yury G. Drexel University, United States of America | 4.90 |
| 4 | 33 |  Sovacool, Benjamin K. Aarhus Universitet, Denmark | 4.82 |
| 5 | 47 |  Manthiram, Arumugam Texas Materials Institute, United States of America | 4.75 |
| 6 | 56 |  Goodenough, John B. Texas Materials Institute, United States of America | 4.71 |
| 7 | 67 |  Grätzel, Michael École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland | 4.66 |
| 8 | 75 | Dincer, I. Ontario Tech University, Canada | 4.65 |
| 9 | 87 | Raabe, Dierk Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH, Germany | 4.61 |
| 10 | 104 | Novoselov, Konstantin Sergeevich National University of Singapore, Singapore | 4.57 |
Top 10 Institutions in Enabling & Strategic Technologies
Number of listed scientists by recorded affiliation.
Top 10 Countries in Enabling & Strategic Technologies
Number of listed scientists by country.
How to Interpret These Figures
The Enabling & Strategic Technologies grouping follows the broad Science-Metrix field recorded in the underlying bibliometric dataset. Counts refer to scientists listed in the 2026 single-year dataset, not to all researchers working in the field.
Discipline position is derived from the number of listed scientists across the 20 fields. It is not an official ranking of disciplinary quality. Country figures reflect recorded affiliations, not citizenship. Institution names may have variants; historical changes may also reflect changes in dataset coverage.
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers about Enabling & Strategic Technologies based on the 2026 single-year ranking data.
23,813 researcher records are classified under Enabling & Strategic Technologies in the 2026 single-year dataset. This is not a census of everyone conducting research in the field.
Enabling & Strategic Technologies is positioned #2 when broad disciplines are ordered by their listed researcher counts in the selected dataset. This is not a ranking of disciplinary quality or scientific importance.
The Top 10 Institutions and Top 10 Countries charts show where listed researchers classified under Enabling & Strategic Technologies are most frequently associated in the selected dataset. These figures represent researcher counts, not comparisons of institutional or national research quality.
The page uses the broad Science-Metrix field recorded in the underlying Scopus-derived ranking dataset. This classification should not be interpreted as a complete description of a researcher’s expertise or interdisciplinary work.
Both views can be explored, but they summarize citation impact over different timeframes. Their counts and positions should not be treated as directly interchangeable measures of disciplinary performance.
Use the Browse all scientists link on this page to explore researcher records filtered by Enabling & Strategic Technologies, 2026, and the selected single-year ranking.