Artificial Intelligence in Research
Researchers should establish necessary approvals before using AI in activities that affect participants, change approved procedures, or introduce new data-processing risks. Learn how to distinguish ethics approval, institutional authorization, privacy review, and methodological validation before participant data are collected.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
AI research tasks differ in their scientific and ethical risks. Learn how to classify activities using the consequences of error, uncertainty, information sensitivity, detectability, and available safeguards, without mistaking a practical risk matrix for a validated universal standard.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
AI outputs that materially affect research evidence, analysis, or conclusions require verification appropriate to their scientific role. Learn which tasks need independent checks, what counts as independent evidence, and when verification should go beyond asking another AI system.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
Some AI-assisted research tasks require qualified humans to examine individual outputs, while others can be evaluated through independent calculations or systematic validation. Learn when human double-checking is necessary, how it differs from routine approval, and how to design review procedures that detect consequential errors.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
Not every use of AI in research requires ethics committee approval. The need for review depends on whether AI changes participant-facing procedures, introduces risks, affects consent or eligibility, or alters the processing of protected research information. Learn how to identify activities that warrant formal review or an institutional determination.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
AI use may require privacy or information-security review when research information is transferred, stored, accessed, or processed under new arrangements. Learn how to assess sensitive data, external providers, retention practices, access controls, and authorization before introducing AI into a research workflow.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
Not every interaction with AI requires the same disclosure. Researchers should distinguish AI-assisted writing from methodological contributions, understand journal and institutional requirements, and report consequential AI involvement with enough detail to support scientific scrutiny.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
Researchers do not necessarily need to preserve every conversation with AI. Consequential interactions should be documented when they affect research methods, evidence, analysis, or conclusions. Learn what to record, how much detail is necessary, and how to protect confidential information in AI research logs.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
Researchers should not enter information into AI systems merely because the technology can process it. Learn how to identify prohibited or restricted inputs, assess confidentiality and reidentification risks, and distinguish public AI services from appropriately authorized research environments.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
AI model updates can change research outputs even when prompts and datasets remain the same. Learn how to document model versions, assess changes in performance, protect longitudinal comparability, and decide when revalidation or reanalysis is necessary.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
A prepublication AI audit examines whether AI-assisted research procedures are sufficiently documented, verified, and scientifically defensible. Learn how to trace AI contributions, assess methodological errors, review confidentiality and disclosure obligations, and decide whether unresolved issues must be corrected before submission.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
Future researchers may need more than an AI disclosure statement to understand how a study was conducted. Learn which model details, prompts, outputs, data references, validation evidence, and human decisions should be preserved, how to organize them, and when confidentiality limits what can be shared.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
The availability of AI does not establish that it is appropriate for every research task. A practical responsibility test can help researchers evaluate methodological suitability, verification, authorization, potential harm, documentation, and whether AI offers a defensible advantage over alternative procedures.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
Researchers may receive convincing AI-generated analyses without possessing the expertise needed to recognize errors. Learn how to evaluate your understanding of an AI-assisted task, distinguish implementation mistakes from methodological problems, and determine when independent evidence or qualified expertise is necessary.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
AI-generated answers can be persuasive without being scientifically correct. Learn what independent verification means, how to select suitable checks for different research tasks, and when insufficient evidence should prevent researchers from relying on an AI output.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
Researchers may have legitimate access to information without permission to share it with an AI provider. Learn how to assess consent, confidentiality, institutional authorization, contractual restrictions, and provider processing arrangements before submitting research data to AI systems.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
An AI error may be a minor inconvenience or a serious threat to participant welfare and scientific validity. Learn how to assess the severity, detectability, and consequences of AI mistakes before relying on automated outputs in research.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
Security claims and enterprise subscriptions do not automatically make an AI tool suitable for confidential research. Learn how to evaluate provider terms, data flows, access controls, retention, and institutional authorization before selecting an AI system for a research task.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
Naming an AI application may not identify the model that produced a research output. Learn how to document providers, model identifiers, configurations, execution dates, and system dependencies, and how to report uncertainty when exact model information is unavailable.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
A saved AI conversation may not be enough to reconstruct a research procedure. Learn how to preserve the inputs, model information, outputs, transformations, verification evidence, and human decisions needed to explain how AI-assisted findings were produced.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
Researchers may need to explain their AI use to stakeholders with different responsibilities and expectations. Learn what each stakeholder needs to know, how to substantiate AI-assisted procedures, and why being comfortable with disclosure is a useful reflection exercise but not a substitute for compliance or scientific validity.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
Researchers remain accountable for the scientific work they submit, even when AI contributes to writing, code, analysis, or interpretation. Learn what full responsibility means, what cannot be delegated to AI, and how researchers should respond when they cannot adequately verify or defend the final output.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
Full AI transparency raises a question beyond whether researchers complied with disclosure requirements: would the research remain scientifically defensible if its AI contributions were examined? Learn how to evaluate methodological validity, independent verification, accountability, and the limits of transparency as a research-integrity safeguard.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
Faster research is not necessarily better research, but efficiency can still be a legitimate benefit. Learn how to distinguish AI-generated time savings from improvements in scientific quality, account for verification and correction costs, and decide whether AI provides sufficient value for a particular research task.
Read Guide →
Artificial Intelligence in Research
AI is not necessarily the best tool for every research task. Researchers should compare AI-assisted approaches with simpler validated alternatives, considering accuracy, methodological suitability, reproducibility, verification effort, and the actual benefits of automation.
Read Guide →
